ReadMeFeed / Community knowledge
Real questions. Useful conversations. Find the people who know your stack.
Learn why Okta’s Org Authorization Server can’t issue custom scopes and how a Custom Authorization Server gives you least‑privilege tokens with verifiable issuer and audience claims.
Moving from Okta's default Org Authorization Server to a Custom AS lets you issue JWTs with your own scopes and audiences, but adds licensing, rate limits, and migration complexity. A practical walkthrough with validation and trade-offs.
I'm designing an integration that calls Okta APIs (Users and OAuth 2.0 token endpoints) from multiple worker processes against a single org, using one custom authorization server. My understanding from the documentation is that rate limits are enforced per endpoint and per authorization server, and that exceeding them returns HTTP 429 with a Retry-After head
The goal is to guarantee that a change to the OAuth token store schema—such as adding a column or altering a data type—can be rolled back without causing validation failures for tokens that were issued before or after the change. Constraints include the lack of a standardized schema‑version signal in the token introspection response, the need for both the Au
Transitioning from static secrets to PKCE Public clients in OAuth 2.0 are moving away from the use of client_secret due to the inability to securely store credentials in client-side applications. The implementation of Proof Key for Code Exchange (PKCE) as defined in RFC 7636 addresses this by introducing a code_verifier and code_challenge to bind the authori
okta