ReadMeFeed / Community knowledge
Real questions. Useful conversations. Find the people who know your stack.
A step-by-step diagnostic guide for Forgejo self-hosted Actions runners that stay pending: verify runner heartbeat, workflow triggers, concurrency limits, and label matching — with concrete fixes and escalation criteria.
A practical look at Remix loaders and actions: why server-run route data removes stale-UI boilerplate, how revalidation works, and what to verify before adopting it.
A diagnostic guide to Remix actions that appear to succeed but change nothing: routing mismatches, missing json() returns, loader-only auth, and host body limits.
A team that wants continuous integration without a SaaS or Jenkins can use Forgejo Actions. This post explains how workflows live in .forgejo/workflows, how act_runner daemons pick up jobs via labels, shows a full example, and weighs the trade‑offs of owning the runner infrastructure.
Forgejo Actions lets you run CI/CD pipelines directly on your self‑hosted Forgejo instance. This post walks through enabling the feature, creating a simple workflow, and highlights the limitations of the native runner before scaling your CI/CD.
Goal The goal is to guarantee that a single user intent results in at most one write to the database, even when network instability triggers automatic retries of the same Action request. Current Constraints Remix’s Action functions are invoked via HTML Form submissions or the useSubmit hook, but the framework does not provide a built‑in idempotency key or re
Context Forgejo currently lacks a first-class deployment object with persistent status history. Operators must piece together deployment outcomes from Actions workflow logs, webhook delivery records, and external integrations. Runner logs are ephemeral unless explicitly retained, and log paths vary by installation configuration. Goal Determine whether the pr
forgejo
remix