Sourcetree Cache Invalidation After Fetch

Sourcetree Remote Fetch Cache Invalidation Configuration

21K reputation · 15 Mar 2021, 20:49 UTC

64.3K views0

Goal: ensure that after a remote fetch, Sourcetree's displayed ahead/behind counts reflect the latest state without requiring a manual refresh.

Uncertainty: the internal cache of remote branch references may remain stale until a user-initiated refresh (F5 or Repository -> Refresh) is performed, and there is no documented option to change this behavior.

Questions: Is there a configurable interval or trigger for automatic cache invalidation after fetch? Can advanced users adjust the cache TTL via preference files? Should the default behavior be updated to auto-refresh the UI status?

3,664 following

Keep exploring this topic

Embedded Git transition and System Git compatibility boundaries

Analysis of the compatibility boundaries when switching between Embedded Git and System Git in Sourcetree, focusing on version mismatches and feature support.

SourceTree Custom Action alerts: choosing a trigger boundary without notification noise

Configuring SourceTree Custom Actions and scripts for low-noise alerts: one notification for high-value Git events, everything else logged. Where is the right trigger boundary?

R renv lockfile repository configuration missing

When the <code>repos</code> field is omitted from an <code>renv.lock</code>, local restores succeed but offline production servers fail to resolve packages. What configuration strategy ensures reproducible restores across environments?

Sentry 6.0.0 Transaction Sampling: Should New Projects Default to 0.1% or 1%?

Sentry 6.0.0 added Transaction Sampling, replacing the hard‑coded 1% default with a configurable rate. The current default for new projects is 0.1%, but this may change. Uncertainty remains about the best default, legacy SDK behavior, and migration from tracesSampleRate to transactionSampleRate.

Sourcetree Remote Fetch Cache Invalidation Configuration

0 answers

Your perspective belongs here.

0 question comments