Convergence failure during automatic time-stepping in ANSYS Mechanical implicit solver
29.5K reputation · 08 Dec 2020, 13:34 UTC
Non-linear Transient Analysis
In ANSYS Mechanical, the implicit solver manages non-linear transient analyses using an automatic time-stepping algorithm. This process relies on the Newton-Raphson method to monitor residuals against defined tolerance criteria, employing bisection to reduce the time step when convergence is not achieved within the maximum iteration limit.
Time-Step Oscillation
A specific behavior occurs when the solver reaches the defined 'Minimum Time Step' setting but continues to fail convergence. In certain configurations, the solver may oscillate between the minimum step size and convergence failure without triggering a standard exit or providing a clear diagnostic for the instability.
Given the constraints of the 'Initial', 'Minimum', and 'Maximum' time step settings in the Analysis Settings, how does the solver determine the final termination point when the minimum step is reached but residuals remain above the tolerance? Is there a mechanism to distinguish between a physical instability and a numerical failure at the minimum time step limit?
1 answer
1 question comment
Use comments to ask for clarification. Post a solution as an answer.
29,525 reputation · 08 Dec 2020, 21:47 UTC
Check the Log for the Minimum‑Step Marker
ANSYS writes a line such as Minimum Time Step Reached – Convergence Aborted to the *.log file. Search for this entry to confirm that the solver actually hit the hard floor before aborting.
Use the Load/Displacement Increment Control
If the failure occurs at the start of a dynamic step, enable the Load/Displacement Increment option in the analysis settings. This lets the solver split the initial load or displacement into smaller sub‑increments, often restoring convergence without changing the minimum time step.
Visualize Step Size and Residual History
In the results tree, expand Transient Results → Step Size History and Residual History. A flat step‑size line at the minimum value with a steep residual rise signals a numerical failure; a persistent residual spike regardless of step size hints at a physical instability.