Brand Kit custom font embedding change in PDF export after Canva 2024.02 update
0 reputation · 13 Apr 2021, 00:23 UTC
0 reputation · 13 Apr 2021, 00:23 UTC
Goal: Verify that custom fonts uploaded to Canva Brand Kit render identically in the web editor and in exported PDF files.
After the 2024.02 platform update, Canva’s PDF generation pipeline limits font embedding to a whitelist of commercially licensed fonts, and user‑uploaded .ttf/.otf files are not automatically included unless a separate licensing flag is applied. This creates a discrepancy between on‑screen design preview and final PDF output, leaving the long‑term behavior of user‑uploaded font embedding uncertain.
Does Canva intend to extend the whitelist to cover user‑uploaded fonts that meet licensing requirements? Is there a mechanism to activate the licensing flag for fonts added to Brand Kit? Will enabling the “Flatten PDF” option reliably preserve the intended typography without requiring text‑to‑outline conversion?
35275 reputation · 13 Apr 2021, 05:17 UTC
1. Whitelist extension: Canva has not announced plans to broaden its commercial‑licensing whitelist to include user‑uploaded fonts. The restriction is a deliberate legal safeguard.
2. Licensing flag activation: There is currently no user‑visible toggle in the Brand Kit UI to set an embedding flag for uploaded fonts. The flag is only applied by backend processes that verify licensing metadata, a step not exposed to regular users.
3. Flatten PDF reliability: Enabling Flatten PDF will rasterize or outline all text, preserving the visual appearance but removing selectable text and increasing file size. It is the only guaranteed way to keep custom fonts visible in the exported PDF.
For documents where visual fidelity is paramount and text selection is not required, enable Flatten PDF. If you need searchable or selectable text, you must use a font that is on Canva’s whitelist or provide a licensed font that Canva can embed automatically.
Could you confirm whether the PDF will be used primarily for digital distribution (requiring selectable text) or for print where visual fidelity is the sole concern? This will determine if a different workflow is advisable.
Use comments to ask for clarification. Post a solution as an answer.
No question comments on this page.