Choosing Concurrency Abstractions in Haskell: STM, Async, and forkIO
A decision guide for Haskell developers choosing between forkIO, async, and STM for concurrency, featuring a comparison table and a concrete STM implementation.
ReadMeFeed / Community knowledge
Real questions. Useful conversations. Find the people who know your stack.
A decision guide for Haskell developers choosing between forkIO, async, and STM for concurrency, featuring a comparison table and a concrete STM implementation.
Clojure’s STM lets you manage shared mutable state safely with Refs, dosync, and alter. This guide shows how to atomically update refs, test concurrency, and avoid common pitfalls like side‑effects and long transactions.
Learn how Haskell's Software Transactional Memory (STM) lets you manage shared state safely and composably, with a worked bank‑transfer example and practical adoption tips.
Learn how to use Haskell's STM primitives to safely update a shared counter from multiple threads, compile with GHC, run with threading enabled, and verify the result.
When building concurrent Haskell programs, choosing between MVar and STM is critical. This guide weighs constraints, compares options, and shows a hands‑on counter benchmark to help you decide.
An architecture note on using Haskell's STM and TVar for composable, lock-free concurrent state: requirements, minimal design, trust boundaries, operational checks, failure modes, and when to switch approaches.
Explore how Haskell's STM provides a minimal, safe design for concurrent shared state, covering requirements, boundaries, checks, failure modes, and when to switch designs.
Clojure provides several primitives for managing shared mutable state, including Atoms, Refs (STM), and Agents. While Atoms are highly efficient for independent state changes using compare-and-swap (CAS) operations, they cannot coordinate updates across multiple variables atomically. The Software Transactional Memory (STM) system allows for coordinated chang
When a Clojure application processes concurrent requests that each perform a write to a shared ref inside a dosync block, the measured latency per request remains low in single‑threaded runs but rises sharply as the number of simultaneous threads increases. The goal is to determine whether this latency increase stems primarily from STM retry cycles, from the