ReadMeFeed / Community knowledge
Real questions. Useful conversations. Find the people who know your stack.
Learn how to balance cost savings and latency when using IBM Cloud Code Engine’s scale‑to‑zero. A step‑by‑step guide shows deployment, tuning concurrency, measuring cold starts, and handling trade‑offs.
Goal: choose the lower-cost Google Cloud option for an infrequently invoked HTTP endpoint. Cloud Run fully managed bills per request plus vCPU and memory during processing, with configurable concurrency and scale-to-zero. Cloud Functions 2nd generation bills per invocation plus compute time and memory, with no idle-instance charge but per-instance concurrenc
Goal: Determine the minimum number of instances (minInstances) to configure for a Cloud Run service handling low‑traffic, sporadic requests so that total compute cost remains low while request latency stays within an acceptable threshold. Constraints: Cold start latency varies with container image size, language runtime, and VPC connector usage, making the l
Goal Reduce infrastructure cost for a low-traffic web application on Scalingo by determining whether application containers can scale to zero running instances when there is no traffic. Constraints and uncertainty Scalingo bills running application containers by container size and duration, so an idle container can accrue container-hour charges around the cl
The goal is to lower the operating cost of a Quarkus‑based HTTP service that sees only a few requests per day by compiling it to a native image and relying on scale‑to‑zero capabilities of Knative or KEDA. Uncertainty remains around whether the one‑time cost of generating a native image — including the time needed to discover and configure reflection metadat
google
reach
scalingo