ReadMeFeed / Community knowledge
Real questions. Useful conversations. Find the people who know your stack.
Learn how Webpack 5’s Module Federation lets you share code across micro‑frontends at runtime. Walk through a host/remote setup, see a live Button example, and weigh the trade‑offs before you deploy.
Webpack 5 Module Federation lets a host consume independently deployed remotes at runtime, negotiating shared singletons via shareScope to decouple release trains while keeping React and design system instances consistent.
Webpack Module Federation lets teams deploy micro‑frontends independently by sharing code at runtime. This post covers host/remote config, shared dependency strategies, a worked example, and the trade‑offs so you can decide if the freedom is worth the cost.
Learn how Module Federation lets independent builds exchange modules on demand, reducing bundle size and enabling micro‑frontend workflows.
Learn how to eliminate duplicate dependencies in micro-frontends using Webpack Module Federation to share code at runtime without sacrificing independent deployment.
Goal Determine whether an Angular shell application can safely host React-based Clarity components without custom element registration conflicts or theming inconsistencies. Constraints Both @clr/angular and @clr/react re-export the same underlying Web Components from @clr/ui , but each wrapper registers custom elements globally via customElements.define() .
Webpack 5 introduces Module Federation to enable runtime code sharing between independent builds. A critical aspect of this architecture is the shared configuration, which prevents redundant library loading by negotiating versions between the host and remote containers. When a library is marked as a singleton , Webpack ensures only one instance of that depen
webpack
javascript