Implementing Disaster Recovery with the Rancher Backup Operator
Learn how to configure the Rancher Backup Operator to automate etcd snapshots to S3-compatible storage and recover cluster state during a disaster.
Loading…
ReadMeFeed / Community knowledge
#disaster-recovery
Real questions. Useful conversations. Find the people who know your stack.
rancherHow to safely revert a DynamoDB Global Table version upgrade after a failure?
Upgrading DynamoDB Global Tables to version 2019.11.09 introduces significant changes to how replication and write conflicts are handled. When an upgrade process is initiated across multiple regions, a failure during the transition can leave the table in an inconsistent state where some regions are on the new version and others remain on the legacy version.
dynamodbVitess Binary Rollback and MySQL State Interoperability
Component Version Compatibility Vitess supports rolling upgrades by maintaining N and N-1 version compatibility between vtgate , vtctld , and vttablet . While stateless components like vtgate can be reverted by redeploying previous binaries, the vttablet interacts directly with the MySQL instance and the topology server. Stateful Rollback Constraints Certain
vitessPoint-in-Time Restore vs. Long-Term Retention for Failed Schema Upgrades
When managing a failed schema upgrade in Azure SQL Database, the recovery strategy depends on the discovery window of the failure. Point-in-Time Restore (PITR) provides millisecond granularity for immediate reversals, while Long-Term Retention (LTR) backups serve as a fallback for errors discovered after the standard retention period has expired. A critical
MirrorMaker 2 Offset Sync and Consumer Group Restoration Interoperability
Restoring a topic replicated by MirrorMaker 2 into a target cluster requires resuming consumer groups at the correct logical position without duplicates or gaps. MirrorMaker 2 periodically writes consumer-group offset mappings to an internal offset-sync topic, translating source log positions into target-cluster offsets. These checkpoints are point-in-time a
apachekafkaResumable upgrade component coverage for SQL Server 2022 failed in-place upgrade recovery
SQL Server 2022 introduces a resumable upgrade capability for certain components during an in-place upgrade, yet Microsoft states that a full instance upgrade still requires backup-based recovery if it fails. The goal is to define the exact scope of components that support resumable upgrade and understand whether this feature can reduce the need for a comple
microsoftsqlserver
AWS Backup EBS Restoration: Volume Availability vs. Filesystem Readiness
AWS Backup provides the ability to restore Amazon EBS volumes from recovery points, either by creating new volumes or replacing existing ones. While the AWS Management Console and API indicate when a restoration job has reached a "Completed" state, this status refers to the availability of the EBS volume resource within the specified Availability Zone. There
GitLab backup restore: are LFS objects in uploads actually recovered?
GitLab's built-in gitlab:backup:create task bundles the database, repositories, uploads, and CI artifacts into one timestamped tarball, and gitlab:backup:restore brings the instance back from it. The stated goal here is a complete disaster-recovery restore where every project's Git LFS files are usable again without manual re-upload. The uncertainty is aroun
Alembic Downgrade vs. Metadata Database Restore for Failed Upgrades
Schema Recovery Strategies When performing an Apache Airflow upgrade, the airflow db upgrade command applies incremental schema revisions via Alembic. If a migration fails mid-process, the metadata database may be left in an inconsistent state, necessitating a recovery action before the scheduler or webserver can be safely restarted. Recovery Constraints The