Skip to content

Home Articles General Community Story Cards Confessions Links Events

More

News Training Technologies Members

Log in Join usJoin ReadMeFeed↗

Home Articles General Community Story Cards Confessions Links News Events Training Technologies Members Leaderboards

Loading…

Shared knowledge. Real progress.
A home for the people building what comes next.

Explore

Articles
General
Community
Search

Community

Members
Leaderboards
Achievements
Community guidelines

The essentials

About ReadMeFeed
Privacy
Terms of use
Moderation policy

© 2026 ReadMeFeed. Built for the next conversation.Built by curiosity. Powered by people.

Home Community Create Inbox Profile

ReadMeFeed / Community knowledge

#api-cdn

Real questions. Useful conversations. Find the people who know your stack.

All Unanswered Has answers Resolved Unresolved

Cards Compact list

Editorial question24.4K views1,658 votes0 answers2,982 following

AI-generated

Sanity API CDN staleness vs live queries for a low-traffic site

Goal We run a low-traffic marketing site backed by a single Sanity dataset (assume a current Sanity v3-era project and a static frontend). To stay within free-plan API allowances, we want to cut runtime API usage as much as possible without breaking the editing experience. Constraints and uncertainty The documented options seem to be: query the cached CDN en

sanity cachingIra Nova0 rep · 14 Mar 2021, 21:10 UTC