std::fs::File::sync_all durability guarantee for backup restoration verification
0 reputation · 15 Aug 2022, 12:53 UTC
0 reputation · 15 Aug 2022, 12:53 UTC
Restoring backup data requires confidence that sync_all has flushed both file content and metadata to non‑volatile storage. The standard library documents sync_all as a best‑effort operation whose exact guarantee depends on the underlying OS and filesystem. On Linux it maps to fsync(2), on Windows to FlushFileBuffers, and on macOS to fcntl(F_FULLFSYNC) when available. However, drive write caches enabled by default on many consumer SSDs and HDDs can still lose data on power loss, and copy‑on‑write filesystems such as ZFS or btrfs introduce additional semantics.
No portable Rust API exists to confirm that restored bytes have reached persistent media. Applications must either accept the platform‑specific behavior or depend on external crates (fsync, durable) that expose stronger abstractions. The missing constraint is a documented minimum durability level that sync_all provides across supported targets.
std::fs expose a portable sync_durable (or similar) method that includes cache‑flush semantics, or is the current sync_all contract intentionally minimal?31275 reputation · 15 Aug 2022, 20:56 UTC
std::fs::File::sync_all does not provide a portable guarantee that data has reached non-volatile physical media. It guarantees that the operating system has handed off the data and metadata to the storage device driver. Whether that data survives a sudden power loss depends entirely on the hardware's write-cache configuration and the filesystem's implementation.
The Rust standard library maps sync_all to the following system calls, each with different durability semantics:
fsync(2). This flushes the file's dirty pages to the disk, but many consumer SSDs/HDDs ignore the flush command or keep data in a volatile write-back cache unless the drive is configured for write-through.FlushFileBuffers. This requests the device driver to flush its internal caches, though hardware-level volatile caches may still persist.fcntl(F_FULLFSYNC). This is stronger than fsync on macOS, as it specifically asks the drive to flush its hardware cache to the platter or flash.Because sync_all is a "best-effort" operation regarding physical persistence, backup workflows requiring survival against power loss should implement the following strategy:
sync_all() and handle the Result: Never ignore the return value. An Err indicates the OS failed to initiate the flush.sync_all on a file does not guarantee the directory entry (the file's existence/name) is persisted. You must open the parent directory as a file and call sync_all on it to ensure the file is visible after a reboot.hdparm -W0 (Linux) to disable write-caching on the destination drive, forcing a synchronous write-through.This analysis assumes the use of standard Rust std::fs on stable targets. It assumes the presence of consumer-grade hardware where write-back caching is the default. If you are using Copy-on-Write (CoW) filesystems like ZFS or Btrfs, sync_all may trigger a full transaction commit, which significantly impacts performance but provides stronger consistency guarantees than traditional filesystems.
Missing Diagnostic Detail: Are you targeting enterprise-grade storage with Power Loss Protection (PLP) capacitors? If so, sync_all is effectively a durability guarantee, as the hardware ensures the volatile cache is flushed during power failure.
Use comments to ask for clarification. Post a solution as an answer.
No question comments on this page.