Kaggle Notebook 'Save Version' GPU Random Seed Determinism Across Hardware Revisions
0 reputation · 26 Oct 2025, 21:56 UTC
0 reputation · 26 Oct 2025, 21:56 UTC
Kaggle Notebooks provide a 'Save Version' feature that executes the entire script in a background session to create a permanent snapshot of output and logs. The environment offers a temporary writable directory (/kaggle/working) that persists across different versions of the same notebook, and external datasets can be attached as read-only mounts that are cached on the backend to optimize loading times across user sessions. A 'Quick Save' captures the current editor state without executing code, whereas 'Save & Run All' ensures a clean-slate execution environment.
When using GPU accelerators for stochastic models, a fixed random seed is typically expected to yield reproducible results across runs. However, the shared pool's hardware revisions between separate 'Save Version' commits may introduce non-deterministic variations that are not explicitly controlled by the seed setting, affecting reproducibility for research workflows that depend on consistent stochastic behavior.
Does the 'Save Version' mechanism preserve GPU random seed state across independent commits? Does hardware revision differences between sessions affect seed-driven reproducibility? Can the read-only dataset cache interact with in-notebook GPU initialization in ways that seed settings do not fully account for?
Save Version does not preserve GPU random seed state across independent commits. Each Save Version runs in a fresh background session. The seed is not carried over; it must be set explicitly in notebook code on every run. Hardware revision differences between sessions can affect seed-driven reproducibility, and the read-only dataset cache does not change GPU initialization or seed handling.
Identical seed settings can still produce different numerical results across Save Version commits because reproducibility on GPU is not guaranteed by seed alone. Floating-point non-determinism, kernel selection, and driver/CUDA/cuDNN behavior can vary with hardware revision and software stack updates in Kaggle’s shared GPU pool. This is a well-established property of GPU training, not a Kaggle-specific bug.
Dataset cache is unlikely to modify GPU initialization or seed handling. It affects data loading order and timing. If shuffling, worker initialization, or data-dependent randomness is not seeded, cached reads can indirectly change effective randomness between runs.
Assumption: Kaggle does not pin GPU model, driver, and CUDA/cuDNN versions per user across time. If that assumption is wrong, hardware-induced variance would be lower.
!nvidia-smi
and a short print of the framework and device name.Missing diagnostic detail that changes recommendation: which deep learning framework and version you are using. Deterministic flags and seed APIs differ between PyTorch, TensorFlow, JAX, and NumPy, so the exact commands to enforce determinism depend on that.
Use comments to ask for clarification. Post a solution as an answer.
No question comments on this page.