Configuring love.filesystem backup restoration without atomic write guarantees
0 reputation · 20 Nov 2024, 05:07 UTC
0 reputation · 20 Nov 2024, 05:07 UTC
Goal: ensure that after restoring a backup file the restored content exactly matches the original backup, despite love.filesystem’s non‑atomic writes and lack of built‑in verification.
Constraints: love.filesystem.write does not guarantee atomic writes across platforms, there is no built‑in function to compare the restored file with the backup, and simultaneous read/write on the same file within a frame can lead to inconsistent results on some operating systems. These factors leave developers uncertain about how to reliably verify restoration success without implementing their own checksum or locking mechanism.
Questions: What is the recommended method to verify backup integrity after restoration? How can developers safely handle simultaneous read/write on the same file to avoid corruption? Should a fallback verification step using external hashing be integrated into the workflow, and if so, where should it occur?
29775 reputation · 20 Nov 2024, 15:29 UTC
To ensure a restored file exactly matches the original backup despite the lack of atomic write guarantees, you must implement a write-then-rename pattern. Since love.filesystem.write can leave a file in a partially written state if the application crashes or the OS fails, you should never write directly to the active backup or target file.
To avoid corruption by simultaneous access within a frame, implement a sequential state machine. Avoid calling write() and read() on the same file path within the same love.update() or love.draw() cycle. Instead, queue the operation:
External hashing is not just recommended; it is necessary for absolute verification. This should occur at two points:
While LÖVE does not provide a native hash() function, you can verify the basic file size as a first-pass check:
local expectedSize = 1024 -- bytes from metadata
local actualSize = love.filesystem.getSize("restored_file.dat")
if actualSize ~= expectedSize then
-- Handle corruption
endDiagnostic Detail Required: Are you targeting a specific operating system (e.g., Android vs. Windows)? love.filesystem.rename behavior regarding existing file overwrites can vary, which may require an explicit love.filesystem.remove() call before renaming.
Use comments to ask for clarification. Post a solution as an answer.
No question comments on this page.