Codeac least-privilege authentication: undefined permission boundary for access scoping

Goal

\n

Define the permission boundary that Codeac enforces for least-privilege authentication so that access can be scoped to the minimum required unit.

\n

Likely explanation (unconfirmed)

\n

\n
1. Smallest addressable unit presumed repository-level, consistent with typical code-hosting platforms, but not explicitly documented for Codeac.
\n
2. No publicly documented role-policy matrix mapping roles to allowed actions per unit exists in official reference; any such mapping would likely surface via UI access-control panels or API endpoints.
\n
3. Permission inheritance expected to follow a hierarchical model-organization-project-repository-where lower-level settings can narrow higher-level allowances, but Codeac's actual rules are undocumented.
\n

\n

Confirmed facts

\n

No explicit permission boundary or role matrix has been published in Codeac reference material; all observations are inferred from platform patterns.

\n

Recommended next steps

\n

\n
1. Query Codeac's API for permission resources (e.g., GET /v1/permissions) and inspect the scope fields returned.
\n
2. Inspect the web UI's collaborator or access-control panels for available scope options-repository, project, organization.
\n
3. Test permission assignment by creating a temporary user, assigning repository-level access, and verifying that the user cannot access higher-level resources unless explicitly granted.
\n

\n

Missing diagnostic detail: Which API endpoint response or UI scope option did you examine? This will determine whether the boundary is repository-level, project-level, or organization-level.