Cloud Run and Cloud SQL Auth Proxy: Cost Implications of CPU Always Allocated for Low‑Traffic Workloads
0 reputation · 30 Nov 2024, 03:37 UTC
0 reputation · 30 Nov 2024, 03:37 UTC
Goal: Determine whether enabling the CPU always allocated option for a low‑traffic Cloud Run service that runs the Cloud SQL Auth proxy side‑car reduces overall cost when request frequency is below one per minute.
Constraints: The service must stay within the free tier where possible, keep latency acceptable for occasional users, and maintain a minimal memory footprint so the smallest instance class (e.g., f1‑micro) can still run the proxy without connection errors. The uncertainty lies in balancing continuous vCPU charges against potential cold‑start latency when CPU allocation is disabled, especially given the proxy’s own start‑up time.
Specific questions: Does enabling CPU always allocated increase vCPU usage enough to negate any latency benefit for sub‑minute traffic? Can the Cloud SQL Auth proxy operate reliably on the smallest allowed instance when CPU is not always allocated? What is the expected cold‑start latency impact when CPU allocation is turned off for a service that depends on the proxy?
30775 reputation · 30 Nov 2024, 06:52 UTC
For a service receiving less than one request per minute, CPU allocated only during request processing is almost certainly cheaper than CPU always allocated — the latency benefit of an always-warm instance does not offset continuous vCPU billing at that traffic level. The real question is not cost but reliability: the Cloud SQL Auth Proxy performs background work between requests, and CPU throttling in request-only mode can interfere with it. Pricing and throttling behavior change over time, so verify against the current Cloud Run documentation and pricing calculator before committing.
Confirmed behavior (well-established):
Likely, but verify for your setup:
Yes, in cost terms. At under one request per minute, instances sit idle the overwhelming majority of the time. Always-allocated billing charges you for that idle time continuously, and one warm instance is not even a guarantee — Cloud Run may still scale to zero or start new instances under revision rollouts, so you pay the premium without fully eliminating cold starts. For occasional users, a few extra seconds of cold start a handful of times per day is usually acceptable.
Note that Cloud Run instance sizes are its own CPU/memory tiers — f1-micro is a Compute Engine class and does not apply here. The proxy itself is lightweight and fits comfortably in the smallest Cloud Run memory tier alongside a modest application. The reliability risk is not memory; it is CPU throttling pausing the proxy between requests. Mitigations:
--add-cloudsql-instances flag / Unix socket), which uses the same proxy machinery but is managed by the platform and is the better-tested path for request-only services.There is no universal number — it depends on your container image size, application init time, and region. Measure it rather than estimate it:
# After 15+ minutes idle, time a cold request
curl -o /dev/null -s -w "TTFB: %{time_starttransfer}s\n" https://YOUR_SERVICE_URL
Compare against a warm request immediately after. The delta is your true cold-start penalty, including proxy tunnel setup.
One diagnostic detail that would change this recommendation: whether your users are interactive (cold starts directly felt) or asynchronous (retries hide them). If interactive and latency-sensitive, a scheduled warm-up request every few minutes is a cheaper middle ground than always-allocated CPU.
Use comments to ask for clarification. Post a solution as an answer.
No question comments on this page.