When is Cloudflare a good fit?
Compare suitability, operational responsibilities and limits before choosing this technology for a project. Which trade-offs should guide the decision?
ReadMeFeed / Community knowledge
DNS, routing, load balancing and hybrid cloud connectivity.
Compare suitability, operational responsibilities and limits before choosing this technology for a project. Which trade-offs should guide the decision?
I have an Ubuntu 22.04 server, a MikroTik CRS328-24P-4S+RM switch, and Ethernet connected cameras. I wanted to increase the MTU on all systems so that jumbo frames are transferred, to reduce the CPU load on the server when receiving HD streams from many cameras, however I noticed that even with default MTU settings (1500 bytes) the cameras send jumbo frames
A failure needs to be narrowed down before settings are changed or operations retried. Which evidence best separates application errors from environment and dependency problems?
I have two nginx containers running. One is listening on port 80 the other 8080. Here is how I run them: sudo podman run --rm \ -t \ -p 8080:80 \ --publish-all \ --name nginx-two \ -v ./html2/:/usr/share/nginx/html \ -v ./html2/conf/default.conf:/etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf \ -d nginx The second: sudo podman run --rm -t -p 80:80 --name nginx -v ./html/:/us
A storage private endpoint and its DNS record exist. A VM in a connected network still resolves the ordinary blob hostname to a public address. The VM uses a custom DNS server, while another VM using the intended Azure resolver gets a private address. The application configuration has not changed. Which part of the DNS chain should be investigated?
Recovery needs to recreate the working service and its required data after a machine or process is lost. Which artifacts and state need protection, and how should the restore be checked?
Why can a DNS change work on one device but not another? This Q&A focuses on interpreting the evidence before changing application or network settings.
Check the NIC ring buffer: # ethtool -g eth0 Ring parameters for eth0: Pre-set maximums: RX: 4096 RX Mini: 0 RX Jumbo: 0 TX: 4096 Current hardware settings: RX: 256 RX Mini: 0 RX Jumbo: 0 TX: 256 One can set "RX/TX" up to the limit shown in the "Pre-set maximums" like: # ethtool -G eth0 rx 4096 rx 4096 Question is: by default;, why are these set so low (in e
I want to run a qemu-kvm guest with Debian 9 as its OS on a Debian 10 host. The host is connected to the local network, and I would like the guest to be "visible" to the local network as if it were a regular device connected directly to the network. To this end, I configured a bridge named br0 on the host by editing /etc/network/interfaces as follows: auto l