How to configure interface aliases using Systemd-Networkd?
I am trying to port the following alias from /etc/network/interfaces to /etc/systemd/network/eth0.network . auto eth0:1 iface eth0:1 inet static address 10.0.2.1/24
ReadMeFeed / Community knowledge
Real questions. Useful conversations. Find the people who know your stack.
I am trying to port the following alias from /etc/network/interfaces to /etc/systemd/network/eth0.network . auto eth0:1 iface eth0:1 inet static address 10.0.2.1/24
I can see two json files(host.json and local.settings.json) has been added in Azure Function directory. host.json { "version": "2.0", "logging": { "applicationInsights": { "samplingExcludedTypes": "Request", "samplingSettings": { "isEnabled": true } } } } local.settings.json { "IsEncrypted": false, "Values": { "AzureWebJobsStorage": "UseDevelopmentStorage=tr
Configuration must be available to the application without exposing credentials in source control, logs or browser code. What belongs in the runtime and which access controls matter?
A couple months ago, I created a 100GB Dev Drive to put all my projects on. So far, it works fine, but I'm starting to run out of space and I wanted to extend it's size. However, when I attempt to, I'm completely unable to. Why is this? The dialog mentions that unmovable files may limit the minimum size of the volume, but it doesn't say anything about limits
Don't know if this is an error from AWS or something. I created an IAM user and gave it full admin policies. I then used this user to create an EKS cluster using the eksctl CLI but when I logging to AWS console with the root user I got the below error while trying to access the cluster nodes. Your current user or role does not have access to Kubernetes objec
The same project needs to behave consistently on developer machines, in CI and after deployment. Which versions, dependencies and configuration should be recorded?
My Node.js app is able to work with local Postgres database via npm pg module. I can connect to the Heroku hosted Postgres database (free Hobby Dev plan) via command line with heroku pg:psql command as well. But when my Node.js app is trying to query to Heroku hosted Postgres database I am receiving an self signed certificate error. Here is the output with s
Configuration must be available to the application without exposing credentials in source control, logs or browser code. What belongs in the runtime and which access controls matter?
A performance change should improve the measured workload without sacrificing correctness or wasting capacity. Which measurements and bottlenecks should be considered first?
answered · 17 Sept 2023, 23:51 UTC
answered · 15 Sept 2023, 08:07 UTC