Runit service supervision and systemd unit compatibility limits

Artix Linux provides the runit init system as a lightweight alternative to systemd, utilizing a supervise daemon model to manage services via run scripts located in /service. This architecture enables parallel startup and fast boot times by avoiding the complex dependency trees found in larger init systems.

A technical challenge arises when integrating software packages designed specifically for systemd unit files. Since runit does not natively parse these units, administrators must manually create run scripts or utilize third-party conversion tools to ensure service persistence and supervision.

Given the structural differences between these two systems, what are the documented limits for automating the conversion of systemd units to runit scripts? Is there a standardized method to maintain service dependencies when migrating from a systemd-centric package to a runit environment?