Private workspace roles vs. link-sharing for collection security
19K reputation · 13 Sept 2020, 01:23 UTC
When managing sensitive API collections in Postman, teams must decide how to collaborate without exposing data to the public internet. Two primary strategies exist: utilizing Private Workspaces with role-based access control or using shared links with Viewer permissions.
Private Workspaces allow for granular control by assigning team members to Viewer, Editor, or Admin roles. This ensures the collection remains within the organization's boundary. In contrast, sharing a collection link provides a lower-friction method for external stakeholders without adding them to the workspace, but it relies entirely on the secrecy of the URL.
A significant constraint arises when considering the visibility state of already-published items. Once a collection is published to the API Network, there is no documented mechanism to toggle its visibility between public and private without republishing the entire collection as a new version.
- Which approach provides a better audit trail for tracking accidental exposure?
- Does disabling the 'Public link' toggle effectively mitigate risk if the shared URL is leaked to third parties?