Jeet column-span mixin compatibility flag discussion

Jeet column-span mixin: transition from fixed 12‑column assumption to optional $context argument

0 reputation · 10 May 2026, 21:43 UTC

83.4K views0

When upgrading Jeet from version 6.x to 7.x, the column‑span mixin changed from assuming a fixed 12‑column parent to accepting an optional $context argument that can override the implicit column count.

The shift creates a breaking change for existing code that omits $context, potentially altering widths in nested layouts and complicating visual verification after a backup restore.

Project maintainers are debating whether to introduce a compatibility flag that restores the 6.x behavior for a gradual upgrade path.

Should Jeet provide such a flag, how should it be named and scoped, and what deprecation warnings would accompany its use?

2,526 following

Keep exploring this topic

PixiJS 7: Automatic Renderer Resizing Removed – What’s the Plan for Legacy Apps?

PixiJS 7 removed automatic renderer resizing. Is there a plan to re‑enable it or a recommended workaround for legacy code?

Jeet grid mixins generate div-only markup without semantic ARIA attributes

Jeet grid mixins lack built-in ARIA roles, creating accessibility gaps for screen reader users.

Jeet schema-driven field-level permission configuration

Exploring whether Jeet’s schema can declaratively enforce field‑level permissions without custom server‑side middleware.

SDL3 Event Handling: Renamed Enumerations Break Existing Switch Logic

Investigating whether SDL3’s renamed event enumerations break existing switch logic and how the sdl2‑compat layer handles the mapping. The goal is to determine if we must update code or can rely on compatibility for CI testing.

Jeet column-span mixin: transition from fixed 12‑column assumption to optional $context argument

0 answers

Your perspective belongs here.

0 question comments